Freaky Friday Halloween Decision – Drink and operate your car radio on your property may result in DUI conviction

Freaky Friday Halloween Decision by the Virginia Supreme Court.  The public is mystified by what it considers a new legal absurdity – Listening to your car radio in a private driveway while drinking is illegal and may result in a DUI conviction! Sarafin v. Commonwealth, October 31, 2014.

The odd conclusion in this DUI case is the result of the court’s deference to the General Assembly.  Rather than concluding that the General Assembly occasionally does a poor job drafting legislation, the court does its best to interpret the statute which from time to time results in legal absurdities.  The court bases its decision on rules of statutory construction.  The court states “[W]hen the General Assembly has used specific language in one instance, but omits that language or uses different language when addressing a similar subject elsewhere in the  Code, we must presume that the difference in the choice of language was intentional.”   This might have been a time where the presumption should have been rebutted.

The court declined to read § 18.2-266 (the DUI statute) to require that an operator of a motor vehicle be “on a highway” refusing to apply the legislative definition of “operator” under § 46.2-100 that defines “operator” as “every person who either (1) drives or is in actual physical control of a motor vehicle on a highway or (ii) is exercising control over or steering a vehicle being towed by a motor vehicle.”

The reason for rejecting this definition is that to do so would result in a separate absurdity.  § 18.2-266 reads in part, “It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or operate any motor vehicle, engine or train (i) while such person has a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or more by weight by volume…”  The court points out that trains do not operate on public highways but on privately owned tracks and therefore reading in the “on a highway” language would make the trains provision meaningless.  (Unless of course the statute only restricts drunk train operating when the track intersects with public highways).

Secondly, in 1994, the General Assembly amended § 18.2-266, prohibiting the operation of “mopeds, … on the public highways of this Commonwealth” while the operator is intoxicated, and therefore since § 18.2-266 when referring to an automobile, it does not state “on the public highways of this Commonwealth” for operating “ it must have meant to differentiate the two.

The decision was split 4-3, with a very vocal dissent.   Justice Mims dissenting stated that the court had previously recognized the nexus or connection between § 46.2-100 and § 18.2-266 in Enriquez v. Commonwealth in 2012 when the court stated that “when an intoxicated person is seated behind the steering wheel of a motor vehicle on a public highway and the key is in the ignition switch, he is in actual physical control of the vehicle and, therefore, is guilty of operating the vehicle while under the influence of alcohol within the meaning of Code § 18.2-266.”  Without [the element of ‘on a public highway’], the Court has taken the final step toward construing Code § 18.2-266 to punish a person for merely occupying, rather than operating, a motor vehicle.”  Justice McClanahan, joined by Chief Justice Kinser also dissented, stating that the “on a highway” element has been the Court’s interpretation as far back as 1964, for similar reasons as Justice Mims.


You need experienced counsel.  You should contact a lawyer with Hull Street Law today.   Call 804-230-4200.

Hull Street Law
105 S 1st Street, Suite H
Richmond, Virginia 23219
804.230.4100 fax


 The materials are prepared for information purposes only.  The materials are not legal advice.  You should not act upon the information without seeking the advice of an attorney.  Nothing herein creates an attorney-client relationship.

Virginia DUI Defense – Free Consultation


At Hull Street Law, a division of Thomas H. Roberts & Associates, P.C., we realize the seriousness of being arrested for DUI, or DWI as it is sometimes referred to.  When you are in need of a capable Virginia, DUI lawyer, count on Hull Street Law for strong and effective legal counsel.  Even if it is your first offense, you are facing a mandatory minimum fine of $250 and possible jail time depending on your blood alcohol level.  Penalties become increasingly harsh with every subsequent offense.  Our Virginia, Va DWI attorneys are skilled in this complex area of the law; we will work to obtain the very best outcome possible on your behalf.

In the Commonwealth of Virginia, there are generally three methods that are used to determine that an individual was intoxicated while operating a vehicle.  Your driving behavior (i.e. weaving, driving recklessly, etc.), field sobriety tests and breath/blood alcohol tests are typically used to determine that you were driving while under the influence.  Our Virginia DUI lawyers are experienced and knows that these tests are not always perfect, the results not always reliable.

Did the police officer have reasonable suspicion to pull you over?  The results of field sobriety tests are not always indisputable, and there are many problems with breath/blood tests.  The individual who administers these tests must be licensed; tests must be handled properly.  Results are not always accurate.  Your Va DWI attorney will know how to challenge the evidence against you, and build a strong defense if it becomes necessary to go to court.

Being convicted on charges of driving while intoxicated can negatively impact your life in many ways.  Not only are the fines steep, your reputation or career may be affected.  Many employers do not want an employee on their payroll who has a criminal record.  Your insurance rates will likely increase; if you are a repeat offender, your insurance provider may drop coverage altogether.  Your license will be suspended, and you will need to get a restricted license so that you can drive under certain circumstances, such as to go to and from work or school.  A trusted Va DUI attorney can explain all of the details to you, and answer any questions you may have.

Whether you are innocent or guilty of the charges leveled against you, it is critical that you have a qualified Va DWI lawyer on your side.  This is a serious criminal offense, and one that requires legal support and guidance. An experienced attorney will work to have the charges against you reduced so that the consequences you face are less severe, or to have them completely dismissed when possible.  At Hull Street Law, a division of Thomas H. Roberts & Associates, P.C., with two offices in the Capital of Virginia, our Va DWI lawyers are aggressive and skilled, ready to do whatever is necessary to protect your rights, reputation and freedom.  Contact one of our VIRGINIA DUI lawyers today for a free consultation:




virginia dui, virginia dui attorney, dui attorney in virginia, dui attorney in va, experienced dui va attorney, experienced dui law firm, experienced dui law firm in va, experienced va dui law firm, dui defense in va, dui defense law firm in virginia, 2nd time offense, 2nd time dui offense, 2nd dui, 2nd dui offense in va, attorney to defend 2nd time dui offense in va, va attorney to defend 2nd dui offense